Question asked by Javinder Singh
Thanks. I am interested in Buddhism because I am not sectarian. I see no difference between attainement of Guru Nanak, Ramalinga, Gautama Buddha, Laozi, Socrates, Jesus. Many of those attained liberation and the vajra body.
But what differenciate Buddhism from most religions is that Buddhism is direct and offer the explanations, it goes to the point directly at least in many schools.
In India we have the concept of brahamcharya which is equivalent to sila, meditation and pure contemplation. I tell some people to practice brahmacharya to have a different outlook at life and not be obssesed by news or politics, but vast majority no matter where they come from, are not receptive to this.
Dear Javinder Singh,
Thank you for being not sectarian, this is a correct and beautiful attitude that everyone should embrace especially those who claim to be spiritual. Our planet earth would be a more peaceful place to live in if there are no inter-religious conflicts. I agree with you that Buddhism is direct and offer explanations, that’s also the main reason I end up becoming a Buddhist after years of being sceptical about religions. Regarding brahmacharya, if I understand correctly, it’s to refrain ourselves from indulging in sexual activities. I believe it’s not easy to be accepted by the majority however I think the key is we ourselves practice the real dharma and set a good example, then our words will bear more weight in the future if our ultimate aim is to benefit others.
I believe you will like this article: https://www.tsemrinpoche.com/tsem-tulku-rinpoche/inspiration-worthy-words/dharma-is-for-everyone.html